The League of Women Voters of Snohomish County

A Guide to Program: 1957-2005

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

A.     A Brief History of the League of Women Voters of Snohomish County                  1

B.     GOVERNMENT

1.      Governmental Structure and Operations..................................................................... 3

2.      Election Laws and Procedures................................................................................... 4

3.      Port Districts............................................................................................................. 4

4.      Citizen Participation................................................................................................... 4

C.     NATURAL RESOURCES

1.      Transportation........................................................................................................... 5

2.      Conservation of Natural Resources............................................................................ 6

3.      Solid Waste Management.......................................................................................... 7

D.  SOCIAL POLICY

4.      Homelessness and Housing........................................................................................ 8

5.      Mental Health Care Services...................................................................................... 9

6.      Juvenile Services...................................................................................................... 11

E.  LWVSC Positions Adopted by LWVWA through a Concurrence Process

7.    Health Care............................................................................................................. 12

8.    Formation of New Counties..................................................................................... 12


The League of Women Voters of Snohomish County (LWVSC)

A Guide to Program: 1957-2005

 

 

A. A Brief History of the League of Women Voters of Snohomish County
 

History of the League began with the work of the National American Women Suffrage Association, the group which led the 72-year drive for women's voting rights. The League was established in 1920 to help the nearly 20 million newly enfranchised women carry out their new responsibilities. Although women won the right to vote in Washington state in 1910, it was nine years before the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution extended the vote to all the nation's women. In the early days, The League of Women Voters of Washington supported state legislation pertaining to protection of children in fields of labor, health and education. League celebrated its 80th Anniversary in 2000.

 

The League of Women Voters of Snohomish County was formed in 1968 through the consolidation of the Leagues that had formed in South Snohomish County and in Everett in the late 1950s. Prior to 1968, the program focus of the two Leagues was the structure of local government.

 

Before becoming the League of Women Voters of Snohomish County, LWVSC went through several name changes. In 1957, the LWV of Mountlake Terrace began as a provisional League and subsequently became an official League in 1958. In 1959, it became the League of Women Voters of Snohomish County. In 1966, the League of Women Voters of Everett disbanded after having been a League since 1960 and joined the South County League. At the annual meeting in 1968, it then became the League of Women Voters of Snohomish County.

 

A Know Your County booklet was published in 1966 by the Everett and South Snohomish County Leagues. That publication has been updated periodically and thousands of copies distributed. It remains the sentinel citizen's guide to Snohomish County government.

 

A League study of county government led to the conclusion that the space for jail facilities and county government operations was inadequate. A concurrent study on juvenile services found that those services were also inadequate. As a result, in 1964 the League supported a $4.5 million county bond issue proposition to finance an addition to the county courthouse and a youth detention center. The bond issue passed and those facilities were constructed.

 

Further study of county government led to the adoption of a League position favoring home rule for Snohomish County. Two league members served on the Home Rule Charter Commission. However, the proposed charter was defeated at the polls in 1968. A home rule charter was adopted eleven years later and became effective in 1980.

Other positions that were reached after study in the 1960s include support for enforcement of election laws and procedures, support for regional comprehensive planning, and park acquisition.

 

In recent years, studies have been performed and positions adopted on a range of local issues, including the following:

·        Growth Management

·        Solid Waste Management

·        Health Care

·        Mental Health Care

·        Homelessness and Housing

·        Formation of New Counties

The League of Women Voters of Washington subsequently adopted LWVSC's positions on health care and the formation of new counties.


B.  GOVERNMENT

1.      Governmental Structure and Operations

During the 1950’s, the LWV of Everett adopted a study of county government.  A survey of county services was completed in 1959.

The LWV of South Snohomish County adopted a study of governmental units in South Snohomish County in 1961.  The scope included an overview of the county governmental structure.

In 1962, the Everett League disbanded and many of the members became active in the South Snohomish County League.  The area-wide League of Women Voters of Snohomish County was formed in 1968.

In 1964, the League endorsed a 4.5 million dollar County Bond Issue to finance an addition to the county courthouse and the construction of a new youth detention center.  The Bond Issue failed in the Primary Election, but passed in the General Election.

A “Know Your County” booklet was published in 1966 and has been kept current by several revisions, including one that first went online in 2003.

The League supported Charter Government for Snohomish County and League members served on the Charter Commission.  The proposed Home Rule Charter was defeated at the polls in 1969, but finally adopted in 1980. 

In 2005, the League archived the three governmental structure and operations position statements because the positions were no longer relevant to contemporary issues facing the county.

 

Statement of positions on County Government:

County Facilities (adopted 1964, archived 2005)

·         Support adequate new jail facilities in the form of new construction that can be readily expanded.

·         Support expansion of space for county offices.

Governmental Operations (adopted 1966, archived 2005)

·         Support regular communication between County Commissioners and County Department heads to facilitate greater understanding of the functions, needs and priorities of each Department.

·         Support a policy of regular communication between Department heads to encourage interdepartmental cooperation.

·         Support the hiring of a professional financial advisor.

Form of Government (adopted 1967, archived 2005)

Advocate the reorganization of county government by drafting of a county charter.  The charter should include the following provisions:

·         An elected policy-making council

·         A professional administrator appointed by and responsible to the council

·         Department heads appointed by the Administrator subject to qualifications established by the council

2.      Election Laws and Procedures

In 1960, a “Study of Election Procedures and Political Organizations in Snohomish County” was adopted.  The study was expanded to the statewide level at the 1963 State Convention. 

League members monitored local election procedures at the polls and urged the updating of voter registration records.  Annual workshops for the poll workers were co-sponsored by the League and the County Auditor.

Statement of position on Election Laws and Procedures:
Seek enforcement of

·        Registration laws

·        Election procedures

3.      Port Districts

In 1981, the LWV of Snohomish County adopted a position on Ports that was developed by the Puget Sound Leagues of Women Voters (PSL no longer exists.)

Statement of Position on Port Districts:

Encourage Port Districts to

·        Emphasize environmental values

·        Coordinate planning

·        Be accountable to the public

4.   Citizen Participation

At the 2005 annual meeting, the LWV of Snohomish County adopted by consensus a position on Citizen Participation proposed by a local position review committee and based on the national league position with the same name.

Statement of Position on Citizen Participation:

Support citizen participation in local government by advocating that county and local government branches

·        Provide adequate notice of proposed actions

·        Hold open meetings

·        Make public records readily accessible


C.  NATURAL RESOURCES

1.      Transportation

The transportation issue was first addressed by an alliance of local Leagues called the Puget Sound Leagues.  Local Leagues adopted the transportation positions developed by that organization. 

Prior to 1973, PSL with concurrence from the LWVSC and other local Leagues lobbied for a Department of Transportation and money for public transit.

Transportation was the subject of a LWVWA study in 1973-1974 and has remained an important program topic with a detailed position statement, which has been developed and revised since the initial study.  (See pp 10 & 11 of Program in Action 2001-2003, a LWVWA document.)  The position emphasizes the need for a balanced transportation system, which promotes development in centers and reduces single occupancy vehicle use.  The position supports financing which supports transit.  It also recommends a single transportation agency with a director appointed by the Governor. 

The LWVSC has had representation on the LWVWA committee and has participated in lobbying and projects, both statewide and local.  The LWVSC focus has been on supporting transit.  In 2001, a local program position addressing a possible merger of Community Transit and Everett Transit was adopted. In 2005, the transportation position statement was reorganized.

 

2001 Statement of Position on Transportation:

Support comprehensive regional planning for transportation and conservation of natural resources.  Transportation planning to include:  

I.        Monitor the possible consolidation of Everett Transit and Community Transit using the following criteria: 

·         An independent audit that focuses on the following:

         Any cost saving to be achieved

         Equalization of taxes

         Possible increases in service to riders

·         A clear resolution of the following issues:

         Employee benefit inequities that may arise

         Labor relations issues, including possible workforce reductions

·         A long-term service plan that accomplishes the following:

         Increase ridership

         Ensure smooth transfers between modes of transit

         Provide a quick response to service needs

II.     Continue public education and monitoring of many layers of transportation planning.

 

 

 

2005 Statement of Position on Transportation:

Support comprehensive regional planning for transportation that reflects conservation of natural resources.

·        Support a long-term service plan that

o       increases ridership

o       ensures smooth transfers between modes of transit

o       provides a quick response to service needs

·        Continue public education and monitoring of the many layers of transportation planning.

·        Monitor the possible consolidation of Everett Transit and Community Transit under an agreement that includes

o       an independent audit that focuses on the following:

a)      any cost saving to be achieved

b)      equalization of taxes

c)      possible increases in service to riders

o       a clear resolution of the following issues

a)      employee benefit inequities that may arise

b)      labor relations issues, including possible workforce reductions

 

2.      Conservation of Natural Resources

Land use planning by government first appeared in the Program of League of Women Voters of Snohomish County with the adoption of a position in 1966 as follows:

The League of Women Voters of Snohomish County supports the principle of long-range regional comprehensive planning.  A comprehensive plan for South Snohomish County should include the basic elements of planning with emphasis on mass transportation, recreation and conservation of natural resources and beauty. 

In 1967, members voted to continue the study and in 1968 arrived at the following position:

o         Support balanced park programs of acquisition and development which take into consideration topography, population density and projected growth, and which provide a wide variety of facilities for all age groups. 

o         Urge cooperation between park departments and school districts to promote maximum use of public recreational facilities and school properties.

o         Urge communication and cooperation among park departments to effect overall planning and cooperation with industry, especially regarding salt-water sites.

o         Encourage the construction of public swimming pools. 

Pursuant to the adoption of a position, League supported a county bond issue to finance acquisition of parklands, as well as an unsuccessful Edmonds Park Bond to finance the construction of Yost Swimming Pool.

Growth management in Snohomish County became the subject of a study in 1980.  Two League members served on a county advisory committee, which developed a growth management plan for the county.  The consensus to support county and city compliance with the state Growth Management Act grew out of the study and was added to the League position on Conservation of Natural Resources in 1981. 

In 2001, the Conservation of Natural Resources position was broadened to add “Local action: Monitoring and evaluation of Endangered Species protection for listed salmonid runs in Snohomish County.” In 2005, this addition was dropped and some minor editing was done for clarity.

Statement of Position on Conservation of Natural Resources:

Support regional planning that reflects conservation of natural resources:

·         Park acquisition and development.

·         Citizen participation in planning, zoning, land use and water management.

·         County and city compliance with Growth Management Act.

 

3.      Solid Waste Management

The handling of solid waste by counties received intensive scrutiny in 1986-87, the most controversial proposal being incineration of solid waste as a major solution to the problem.  League members served on a county advisory committee, which developed a set of recommended priorities for disposal of solid waste.  The League developed the following position statement, which appeared in the Voter in March of 1987.

1987 Position Statement on the Incineration of Solid Waste:

We recognize we have a solid waste problem.  We have some major concerns about the environmental risks, such as dioxins and heavy metals, of incineration, particularly mass burn.

We approve of the stated priorities of Snohomish County and Washington State DOE, which require waste reduction and recycling first, then incineration and landfill.  We suggest the budget should reflect these priorities accurately.  We want a 5-year moratorium on incinerator construction while waste reduction and recycling programs are developed to the maximum. This would include major incentives to encourage recycling and recycling industries. It could include mandatory recycling, decreasing plastic packaging and increasing markets for recycled products.

The County shall exercise its authority to achieve and enforce these goals.  We know the county has the authority to deny landfill facilities to recyclable products, which would be a major incentive to cities to develop recycling programs. 

The position statement has since been revised and shortened as follows because Snohomish County decided against incineration. In 2005, the title of the position was also changed from "Incineration of Solid Waste" to "Solid Waste Management."

Position Statement on Solid Waste Management:

Support the solid waste management priorities of Snohomish County in descending order:

1.      Waste reduction

2.      Recycling

3.      Landfill

 

D.   SOCIAL POLICY

1.      Homelessness and Housing

The problem of homelessness became a study topic in 1989.  Study committee members identified specific areas of concern, including funding, temporary shelter and lack of low-income housing and services for homeless children.  The following consensus was reached in 1990:

League of Women Voters of Snohomish County supports:

·         Shelters to house the homeless while working to find a solution to the problem.

·         Adequate funding from all levels of government and private sources to include support services and education of children.

·         Land use planning to require a range of rents and purchase prices – low to high.

·         Local and county bond levies for low-income housing.

·         Non-profit agencies and housing authorities in the development of low-income housing.

The consensus was modified through several revisions to become the current position. In 2005, during a review of all current LWVSC positions, statements from the national position on housing were prepended to the position to clarify LWVSC's approach.


Statement of Position on Homelessness and Housing:

LWVSC believes that all levels of government and the private sector share the responsibility to help alleviate the housing shortage in the low-income sector. LWVSC also believes that identifying housing needs and planning to meet those needs is best done at the local level. Increase awareness of homelessness though education, advocacy and support for:

1.        Adequate funding.

2.        Services and education for homeless children.

3.        Opening government buildings (lobbies) in inclement weather provided that safety, supervision and sanitary needs are addressed.

4.        Enforcement of the requirements for a range of housing prices through land-use planning.

5.        Bond levies for low-income housing.

6.        Involvement of private and non-profit agencies with housing authorities to provide low-income housing.

7.        Removing emergency housing barriers for persons who have special health or medication needs.